Instapage is rarely recommended by AI. Here is its measured AI-Visibility Score, drawn from 8 live AI engines across our 16-category B2B/GTM audit.
When a buyer asks ChatGPT or Google's AI "what's the best tool for this," only a handful of names make the answer. Instapage earned an AI-Visibility Score of 11.4/100, ranking #31 of 354 measured tools. That is below the three-or-so names most buyers hear when they ask AI for a recommendation, so there is visibility upside to capture.
It was never the top answer in any category we measured, so it appears in the list a buyer is shown but not at the front of it. 7 of 8 engines named it, so it is visible on some assistants and absent from others. It competes in one category only, Landing page builders, where it places #2 of 8. A tool named in a single category has a narrower surface than its score alone suggests.
AI visibility is winnable and separate from Google rankings: the engines we tested disagreed on the #1 tool in most categories, so a product can be invisible to one assistant and a top pick on another. The lever is being named where AI looks, mapped in the cross-engine comparison and the source-bias data.
Instapage was named in 2 of the 16 categories measured and made the ranked leaders in 1 of them. Each table shows that category's ranked leaders, so you can see exactly which rivals the engines named ahead of it and which they named behind.
Weighted score is position-weighted recommendation frequency within that category (a #1 mention counts 1.0, a #2 counts 0.5, and so on), summed across every engine and phrasing. It is not a quality judgement.
See exactly which engines named it, where, and how to raise its AI-Visibility Score.
From the open, CC-BY AI Recommendation Audit: a dated snapshot of what live AI engines recommend, not an endorsement or a quality ranking. Instapage appeared in 15 of 1549 recorded recommendations. Open data.